Thursday, March 12, 2009

Global Warming

Did the title grab your attention? Well, get comfy, and open your mind, because there is more inside than just that.

Global warming is not just some made-up phenomena by the liberal leftists to scare the crap out of the general public. It is a documented fact. In the last twenty years or so the average global temperature has risen 1 degree, give or take a fraction. Now you're thinking, big fat deal, right? The difference between our current average global temperature and that of a minor ice age is a matter of 5 or 6 degrees. That's a difference of 15-20 %. Not such a small number all of a sudden. The controversy over the whole thing is whether or not it's a natural cycle of the earth. Earth has gone through many,many cycles of warmth and cold. Scientists know this through their studies of the ice cores they remove from the poles, among other things. They are not right 100% of the time, but they are right far more often than not. It is their job to understand the workings of the earth. Many factors play into how they arrive at the conclusions they have. Different gaseous concentrations in the atmosphere are present due to fluctuations in temperature, and the effect it has on plants and animals.

For most of history, earth has gone through her cycles without major deviations in influence from its life forms. For the most part, nature is very good at keeping an efficient balance. Overpopulation is dealt with through different levels and types of disease, starvation, and predation. In the recent history of earth, and this includes a very large number of years in relation to human history, there have been huge changes in habitation. The human brain has thrown a major monkey wrench into the cogs of nature. We have a unique combination of the ability for efficient communication, the capacity for abstract thought and problem solving, and the body parts to put it all to use. We have figured out how to get around nature's tools for population control. We can fix or circumvent most mental and physical diseases through scientific research and the use of synthetic substances, we farm to provide food for our growing population, and predation against the human race is nearly non-existent due to our ability to use defensive tools, and our habit of living in communities. This has resulted in a population explosion.

Let's zoom in closer to modern day. Are you of the camp that believes our presence here has no effect on our atmosphere? I challenge you to go into the woods, sit in a tent in 30 degree weather with a candle and a thermometer. Light the candle, watch the thermometer. An average candle will yield around 50 BTU's per hour. You'll be surprised at how much the temperature rises. The average furnace puts out around 90,000 BTU's. How's that for a little perspective? It doesn't take much. Now let's consider a few things. Some of this has been addressed, some possibly not. There are a lot of things you do throughout your day that creates heat. Some of the obvious things are: cooking, heating your house, and taking a shower (water heater). The heat from these activities has to dissipate somewhere. You know where? It goes into the air, or atmosphere, if you like that better.

The human body puts out between 250 and 650 BTU's per hour, depending on the level of activity. When you start your car in the morning, it dissipates heat generated through friction, and the burning of fuel. Your television dissipates heat by turning electricity into usable signals, as does your car stereo. Lights generate heat. The friction of the tires on the pavement generate heat in the tire and the pavement, all of which dissipates into the air. Everything you own was probably manufactured in some way, and in the manufacturing process, created heat, which had to dissipate into the atmosphere. Every single match struck, every lighter clicked, every cup of coffee brewed, has an effect on the temperature of the air around you. When I go to the range, and shoot off 200 rounds or so, every single time I pull the trigger, I cause a small explosion. Some of the heat from that explosion is absorbed by the gun, some is absorbed by the bullet, and much of it dissipates into the air fairly quickly. The gun also generates heat through friction. All of this has to "cool down" eventually. Have you ever picked up freshly fired brass? It's HOT! Think of all your family gatherings around the holidays, and how the room seems to warm so quickly when it's full of people. 20 people generating an average of 450 BTU's per hour each equals 9000 BTU's. I have a heater that puts out exactly that number, and heats a 20 by 20 cabin in November to a comfortable temperature, with no other help necessary. Carbon footprint?? Hmph! Try personal heat signature!

Get the point yet? Let's move on to point number two.

In the last few months, I've heard and read many things concerning water shortages all over our country. Our nation's water content has been higher in recent history (read several hundred years) than in almost all known history before. We traveled to this land mass, and began to slowly move westward and populate it, taking advantage of a seemingly endless supply of water. Now, in the last 20 or so years, water levels throughout our country, most notably in the dry southwest, have been decreasing steadily. If the trend continues, population centers are going to have to change. People will have to start moving closer to water sources, or spend huge amounts of money to figure out how to bring water in to places never before considered necessary to do so.

Are we on the downswing of an exceptionally wet cycle, or do we have something to do with it? Consider that a human being is approximately 60% water. The average human ties up around 13.5-15 gallons of water, just by being alive. Forget consumption for now. Just in living and breathing, the average human hauls around an astonishing amount of water. Our population is around 300 million, and growing. That works out to be 4.5 BILLION gallons of water, eating, sleeping, driving, and banking. Didn't know water could do that? Now you know. You, your family, and all of your friends are containers of water, just trying to get through your daily lives. While you are alive, you are hoarding that water, and it doesn't get returned to the earth until you pass on. Gives new meaning to the phrase "kick the bucket", doesn't it? Now consider, when a person is buried in a sealed casket, where does that water go? I was made aware, today, of the new practice of sealing a sealed casket in concrete. Now that water is REALLY trapped. Are we shooting ourselves in the foot by sealing all that precious water away? I've always been one to want a natural burial of some sort, because my body is made up of water and nutrients that need to be returned to nature, in order to sustain the cycles. Lately, I've found that my desire for this has increased exponentially. Cremation may even be acceptable, as far as the water goes, because it would simply evaporate.

In earth's recent history, human population has increased in a frightening manner. The larger the population, the greater the burden on nature, and the more impact there is on the earth, and everything on it. I firmly believe that at the moment it became necessary to farm crops and animals to sustain human life, we were already overpopulated. At that point, we circumvented at least one of nature's most efficient tools at population control, and ecological balance. To think that our presence on this planet has no impact on our environment is not just ignorant, it's ludicrous, even bordering on stupid. Everything you use has to come from somewhere, and everything you do has consequences on something.

1 comment:

Pete Murphy said...

The biggest obstacle we face in changing attitudes toward overpopulation is economists. Since the field of economics was branded "the dismal science" after Malthus' theory, economists have been adamant that they would never again consider the subject of overpopulation and continue to insist that man is ingenious enough to overcome any obstacle to further growth. This is why world leaders continue to ignore population growth in the face of mounting challenges like peak oil, global warming and a whole host of other environmental and resource issues. They believe we'll always find technological solutions that allow more growth.

But because they are blind to population growth, there's one obstacle they haven't considered: the finiteness of space available on earth. The very act of using space more efficiently creates a problem for which there is no solution: it inevitably begins to drive down per capita consumption and, consequently, per capita employment, leading to rising unemployment and poverty.

If you‘re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, then I invite you to visit either of my web sites at OpenWindowPublishingCo.com or PeteMurphy.wordpress.com where you can read the preface, join in the blog discussion and, of course, buy the book if you like.

Please forgive the somewhat spammish nature of the previous paragraph, but I don't know how else to inject this new theory into the debate about overpopulation without drawing attention to the book that explains the theory.

Pete Murphy
Author, "Five Short Blasts"